Welcome to the Climate Savers - EPA ENERGY STAR Computer Power Management Forum

Please post comments and questions about enterprise computer power management here. This is a free, vendor-neutral resource intended to promote IT energy efficiency, and not a sales forum. Promotional posts by solution vendors and other forms of inappropriate content will be removed by the host. ENERGY STAR support staff will try to respond to technical questions within two to three business days.


Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Members | Log In | Register

Why are PCs not allowed to sleep? Options
Ken Christensen
Posted: Monday, March 30, 2009 2:59:42 PM
Rank: Newbie
Groups: Member

Joined: 3/30/2009
Posts: 1
Points: 3
Organization: University of South Florida
Dear Fellow Energy Savers:

I believe that some enterprise (and residential) PCs cannot be put to sleep without compromising a service. In some cases, a centralized (e.g., Verdiem Surveyor) control of power management settings and wake/sleep state may solve the problem. But, in some cases it may not. I suggest that the following may be cases requiring a PC (this includes laptops) to remain powered on:

1) Sharing files and having these files be both discoverable and accessible to others (e.g., Microsoft Network Neighborhood and P2P)
2) Being able to immediately respond (e.g., alert a user via an audio signal) to incoming communications such as tweets, IMs, IP phone calls, etc.
3) Maintaining secure connections and not having to constantly reconnect (e.g., VPNs and SSH)
4) Being able to offer and maintain remote desktop services (e.g., on the other side of a NAT where a wake-up message may not flow)
5) Being remotely manageable (e.g., responding to SNMP GETs)
6) Being discoverable to determine existence of resources (e.g., uPnP)

Is this a complete list? A correct list? Even close? I look forward to your shared insights on why some PCs just cannot be put to sleep without compromising a service, and what possibly could be done about the situation (i.e., to enable sleep).

Here is what I am doing: http://www.csee.usf.edu/~christen/energy/main.html.

Regards,

Ken Christensen
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
University of South Florida
Phone: (813) 974-4761
Homepage: http://www.csee.usf.edu/~christen
Email: christen@csee.usf.edu
Stephen
Posted: Saturday, February 20, 2010 4:40:34 PM
Rank: Newbie
Groups: Member

Joined: 8/4/2009
Posts: -1
Points: -76
I guess they could all be virtualised to all run on one computer?
tbolioli
Posted: Saturday, February 20, 2010 4:46:14 PM
Rank: Administration
Groups: Administration , Member, Moderator

Joined: 3/11/2009
Posts: 2
Points: 18
Organization: Terra Novum, LLC
Stephen wrote:
I guess they could all be virtualised to all run on one computer?


That wouldn't work because the one computer would have to remain awake. There is something called a ProxZzzy that will start to show up in PCs in the future. It is a more full featured version of Win7's ARP and NS offloads and it should help in addressing Ken's issues.

Just because you can't sleep on the job, doesn't mean your computer can't.
Users browsing this topic
Guest


Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Main Forum RSS : RSS

YAFPro Theme Created by Jaben Cargman (Tiny Gecko)
Powered by Yet Another Forum.net version 1.9.1.8 (NET v2.0) - 3/29/2008
Copyright © 2003-2008 Yet Another Forum.net. All rights reserved.
This page was generated in 0.045 seconds.